PROMOTING CURRICULUM AGILITY THROUGH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING: CASE OF THE AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITY (KUWAIT)

PROMOTING CURRICULUM AGILITY THROUGH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING: CASE OF THE AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITY (KUWAIT)

H. Salti, H. El-Kanj, F. Alkhatib, M. Abdul-Niby (2023).  PROMOTING CURRICULUM AGILITY THROUGH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING: CASE OF THE AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITY (KUWAIT). 481-490.

Curriculum agility has recently drawn the attention of the engineering education sector as it addresses the challenging dynamic nature of engineering markets. Project-based learning (PBL) is foreseen as a successful pedagogy that adds flexibility to engineering curricula and equips graduates with long-life learning skills. The level of flexibility that PBL adds depends on many factors and one of them is the way it is practiced. In this paper, the flexibility added by the currently applied PBL model at the College of Engineering at the Australian University in Kuwait as well as a newly proposed PBL model is assessed from the perspective of experienced PBL facilitators through quantitative and qualitative survey methods. After introducing the two models and the expected enhancements added by the new model on the implementation of CDIO standards, the survey results are presented and thoroughly discussed. The results show that the new PBL model is expected to enhance the flexibility of engineering curricula but also bring to the fore the resilience to change of PBL facilitators and consequently the importance of explanatory and discussion workshops before and during the implementation of new PBL model.

Authors (New): 
Hassan Salti
Hania El-Kanj
Fadi Alkhatib
Mohammed Abdul-Niby
Pages: 
481-490
Affiliations: 
Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait
Keywords: 
Project-Based Learning
PBL
Engineering
Curriculum
curricula
flexibility
Agility
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Crawley, E.F., Hosoi, A., Mitra, A. (2018). Redesigning undergraduate engineering education at MIT the new engineering education transformation (NEET) initiative. ASEE National Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT, USA.: 
Edström, K., and Kolmos, A. (2012). Comparing two approaches for engineering education development: PBL and CDIO. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.: 
Farhat, M., Nahas, M., Salti, H. (2020). Implementation and evaluation of a new PBL assessment mechanism. Proc. of the 16th International CDIO Conference. Bankok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University.: 
Graaff, E., Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657-662.: 
Hussain, YA, Jaeger, M. (2018). LMS-supported PBL assessment in an undergraduate engineering program—Case study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26, 1915–1929.: 
Salti, H., Farhat, M., Abdel Niby, M., Zabalawi, I. (2021). Towards a flexible 2+2 hands-on engineering technology curriculum. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 19(4), 404-409.: 
Go to top