DEVELOPING CURRICULA BY BLACK BOX METHOD

DEVELOPING CURRICULA BY BLACK BOX METHOD

P. Granholm, K. Haajanen, M. Ketola, A. Norström (2021).  DEVELOPING CURRICULA BY BLACK BOX METHOD. 9.

A curriculum can by time develop to a collection of good courses created, executed, and further developed by individual teachers alone. This can lead to curricula where the connection between the courses cannot clearly be seen and the required inputs and outputs between the courses remain unclear. Courses with same content can be arranged twice or lead to a curriculum where crucial content is missing. In this paper we present two cases of curricula development utilizing the black box method. The first case is a curriculum of a recently started education. The curriculum is examined the first time after its creation by the faculty staff. Second case is a curriculum of an education that has been ongoing for several years. In the black box development method, the faculty staff discuss the courses in terms of input and output knowledge and skills only. Every course is considered as a black box. For each course, the faculty members involved in course implementation identify the specific knowledge the students should enter the course with and what knowledge and skills they should bring with them to future courses. The knowledge and skills are expressed as learning outcomes. By collecting this information from all courses in the curriculum, it is possible to identify the connections between different courses and address any inconsistencies such as unnecessary gaps etc. The black box exercise has been performed for two curricula. In the first stage the teachers identified the required input and expected output of the modules. The results from this stage show the need for increased collaboration between teacher teams as well as within the teams. The process has enhanced dialogue and productive discussions among faculty members and increased awareness of the whole curriculum.

Authors (New): 
Patric Granholm
Kari Haajanen
Mari Ketola
Anne Norström
Pages: 
9
Affiliations: 
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
Keywords: 
Black box
Curriculum Development
higher education
Chemical Engineering
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Crawley, E. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2.0 An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education. CDIO Knowledge Library. Cambridge, MA; Worldwide CDIO Initiative. http://www.cdio.org, Dr. Edward F. Crawley, crawley@mit.edu: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund,S., & Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer Science & Business Media: 
EFCE (2020). EFCE Bologna Recommendations 2020. European Federation of Chemical Engineering.: 
Grant, J,. (2014) Uderstanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice, Second Edition. Ed. Tim Swanwick. The Association for the Study of Medical Education. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: 
IGI Global (2021, January 9). What is curriculum. https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/curriculum/6468: 
Lehto, A. and Penttilä, T (eds), (2013). Pedagogical Views on Innovation Competences and entrepreneurship. Innovation pedagogy and other approaches, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Reports 171: 
Rashid, M., & Tasaduk, I. A. (2014) Holistic Development of Computer Engineering Curricula Using YChart Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 57, mo. 3.: 
M. Somerville, J. Geddes, B. Linder, O. Eris, and J. Stolk, "Special Session - Incorporating Values: A User-Oriented Approach to Curriculum Design," Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference, San Diego, CA, 2006, pp. 1-2: 
10.1109/FIE.2006.322621
Wellington, C., (2004) Designing an ABET accreditable computer science bachelor's program within the constraints of a teaching university, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, FIE 2004. Savannah, GA, pp. T3G/18-T3G/23 Vol. 1: 
10.1109/FIE.2004.1408547
Go to top
randomness