Managing the Continuous Improvement Loop of Educational Systems: Students as Key Actors in Program Evaluation

Managing the Continuous Improvement Loop of Educational Systems: Students as Key Actors in Program Evaluation

C. Lassudrie, J. Kontio, S. Rouvrais (2013).  Managing the Continuous Improvement Loop of Educational Systems: Students as Key Actors in Program Evaluation. 11.

More and more, educational frameworks and accreditation bodies recommend implementing a system to evaluate and improve the quality of higher education institutions. This paper describes a student self-evaluation of a French engineering school which was carried out with an external institution as client. It describes the methodology and standards adopted by the students in order to conduct the evaluation, interview stakeholders, and rate compliance with maturity levels. An analysis of the quantitative and qualitative results of this evaluation is drawn, both from the quality assurance and student perspectives. The benefits, bias, and difficulties of this student-led institution evaluation are discussed. Finally, in this paper, the authors identify the skills specific to quality assurance engineers which this project allowed students to develop. They conclude on possible future issues concerning evaluation, such as student-led cross- evaluations among institutions. This paper will permit readers (i) to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a student-led evaluation, (ii) to validate or not the opportunity of dedicated student projects within their programs to facilitate the continuous improvement loop, and (iii) to underline specific student skills developed in such projects.

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

Authors (New): 
Claire Lassudrie
Juha Kontio
Siegfried Rouvrais
Pages: 
11
Affiliations: 
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
Institut Mines Télécom, France
Keywords: 
Engineering education
Program evaluation
Quality Assurance
Self-evaluation
students as key actors in change process
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Rouvrais, S. and Landrac, G. “Resistance to Change in Institutionalizing the CDIO Standards: From a Waterfall to an Agile Improvement Model”. 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, July 1-4, 2012. : 
Patil, A.S. and Gray, P.J. (Editors). “Engineering Education Quality Assurance: A Global Perspective”. Springer 2009. 316 pages.: 
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). “Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, 2013-2014 Education Criteria for Performance Excellence”. http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/education_criteria.cfm Accessed: January 2013. : 
Steed, C., Maslow, D., and Mazaletskaya, A. “The EFQM Excellence Model for Deploying Quality Management: a British-Russian journey”. Higher education in Europe. pp. 307-319. 2005. : 
Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Ostlund S., and Brodeur D.R., “Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach”. Springer Verlag, 286 pages, 2007. : 
SPEAQ Project. “Sharing Practice in Enhancing and Assuring Quality”. EU Lifelong Learning Programme. http://speaqproject.wordpress.com Accessed: January 2013.: 
Kontio, J., Roslöf, J., Edström, K., Thyberg Naumann, S., Munkebo Hussmann, P., SchreyNiemenmaa, K., and Karhu, M. “Improving Quality Assurance with CDIO Self-evaluation – A Case Study”. Intl. Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education. 2012.: 
Kontio, J. and Tuohi, R. “Engaging Students in the Development and Quality Assurance of Degree Programs – a Case Study”. ICEE Conference Proceedings, 21–26.8.2011, Belfast, Ireland. : 
Rouvrais S., Ormrod J., Landrac G., Mallet J., Gilliot J-M., Thepaut A., and Tremenbert P. “A Mixed Project-based Learning Framework: Preparing and Developing Student Competencies in a French Grande Ecole”. European Journal of Engineering Education, "Engineering Competencies". Vol 31(1). Pages 83--93. March 2006: 
Rouvrais, S., Mallet, J., and Vinouze, B. “A Starter Activity Design Process to Deepen Students Understanding of Outcome-related Project Learning Objectives”. 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE 2010), Arlington, Washington D.C., October 27-30, 2010. : 
CDIO. ”The CDIO Standards v.2.0”. 2010. available at http://www.cdio.org/knowledgelibrary/documents/cdio-standards-v-20-customized-rubrics Accessed: January 2013.: 
Kontio, J, Roslöf, J, Edström, K., Thyberg Naumann, S., Munkebo Hussmann, P., SchreyNiemenmaa, K., and Karhu, M. “Quality Assurance With CDIO Self-Evaluation - First Results of A Nordic Project”. CDIO Conference Proceedings, 20–23 June 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark. : 
Kontio, J., Granholm, P., Valmu, H., Mäntykoski, J., Kruusamäe, K., Aukstuoliene, M., Savulionienes, L., Munkebo Hussmann, P., and Edström, K. “Supporting Program Development with Self- and Cross-evaluations – Results from an International Quality Assurance Project”. 816- 823, International Conference on Engineering Education, 2012. : 
Rout, T.P., El Emam, K., Fusani, M., Goldenson, D., and Jung, H.-W. “SPICE in Retrospect: Developing a Standard for Process Assessment”. Journal of Syst.&Softw. 80(9), 2007, 1483-1493. : 
El Emam, K. and Birk, A. “Validating the ISO/IEC Measure of Software Requirement Analysis Process Capability. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26 (6), 541–566. 2000.: 
Go to top
randomness