Benchmarking Engineering Curricula with the CDIO Syllabus

Benchmarking Engineering Curricula with the CDIO Syllabus

J. Bankel, K. Berggren, M. Engström, I. Wiklund, E. Crawley, D. Soderholm, et al, et al (2005).  Benchmarking Engineering Curricula with the CDIO Syllabus. 13.

Four internationally–renowned universities — Chalmers University of Technology, Linköping University, and the Royal Institute of Technology, of Sweden; and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US — developed a stakeholder survey that may be used by any engineering school to benchmark curricula for teaching of personal, interpersonal and system building skills. The results of the benchmark survey indicate that a consistent and deliberately designed curriculum in this area could demand no additional resources, yet provide a much more effective education for the students. The survey gives useful indications of how to begin such a redesign process. This paper was published in The International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 21 No. 1 (2005). Available here through the courtesy of IJEE.

Authors (New): 
Johan Bankel
Karl-Fredrik Berggren
Madelaine Engström
Ingela Wiklund
Edward F. Crawley
Diane H. Soderholm
Khalid El Gaidi
Sören Östlund
Pages: 
13
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Sweden
Keywords: 
Engineering education
Problem based learning
CDIO
CDIO Syllabus
Benchmarking
Year: 
2005
Reference: 
L. Wilkerson and W. H.Gijselaers (eds), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: theory and practice, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 1996, San Francisco, JosseyBass: 
. D. Boud and G. I. Feletti (eds), The Challenge of ProblemBased Learning, 2nd ed., London, Kogan Page (1997).: 
M. SavinBaden, Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Untold Stories, Open University Press (2000): 
D. R. Brodeur, E. F. Crawley, I. Ingmarsson, J. Malmqvist and S. OÈ stlund, International collaboration in the reform of engineering education, Proc. 2002 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 2002. www.asae.org/conferences/proceedings/search.cfm: 
T. E. Sutherland and C. C. Bonwell (eds), Using active learning in college classes: a range of options for faculty, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 67, 1996, San Francisco, JosseyBass: 
S. R. Hall, I. Waitz, D. R. Brodeur, D. H. Soderholm and R. Nasr, Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class, 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., November 2002, Boston, Massachusetts.: 
E. F. Crawley, The CDIO SyllabusÐa statement of goals for engineering education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA (2001).: 
ASEE Engineering Deans Council Corporate Roundtable: Engineering Education for a Changing World, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC (1994).: 
E. F. Crawley, Creating the CDIO Syllabus: a universal template for engineering education, ASEE/ IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 2002, Boston, USA: 
ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2000± 2001 Accreditation Cycle, Revised March 2000, Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology. (http://www.abet.org): 
The Boeing Company, Desired Attributes of an Engineer: Participation with Universities (1996). (http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/pwu/attributes/attributes.html): 
ASME, Integrating the Product Realization Process into the Undergraduate Curriculum, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (1995).: 
N. R. Augustine, Socioengineering (and Augustine's Second Law thereof), The Bridge, Fall 1994.: 
B. M. Gordon, What is an Engineer? Invited keynote presentation, Conf. European Society for Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, 1984: 
. R. E. Kelley, How to be a star engineer, IEEE Spectrum, October 1999.: 
W. J. King, The unwritten laws of engineering, Mechanical Engineering, May/June/July 1944.: 
J. D., Lang et al., Industry expectations of new engineers: a survey to assist curriculum designers, J. Eng. Educ., January 1999.: 
MIT, Committee on Engineering Undergraduate Education, Eight Goals of an Undergraduate Education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology School of Engineering, Cambridge, M: (1988).: 
MIT, Task Force on Student Life and Learning, Task Force Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1998). (http://web.mit.edu/committees/sll): 
Go to top
randomness