UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION THEMES IN STEM HIGHER EDUCATION: A EURO-ASEAN PERSPECTIVE

UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION THEMES IN STEM HIGHER EDUCATION: A EURO-ASEAN PERSPECTIVE

S. Rouvrais, G. Jacovetti, P. Chantawannakul, N. Suree, S. Bangchokdee (2020).  UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION THEMES IN STEM HIGHER EDUCATION: A EURO-ASEAN PERSPECTIVE. Volume 1, pp.91-102.

This paper analyses University-Industry collaboration models in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics education. First, a review of published CDIO optional standards for University-Industry collaboration is presented. With strong industrial link requirements, the French related standards for engineering accreditation are then scrutinized and echoed with European requirements. To broaden the perspective, the Swedish and Thai quality criteria for industry links are also reviewed. As a result, five identified University-Industry collaboration themes and criteria of requirements are mapped in a table. Three new emergent themes are also identified based on questionnaires and interviews operated during fall 2019 in the context of a Euro-ASEAN capacity-building project. By identifying themes of collaboration with industry and business, the analysis of this paper lay the foundation of a structured relationship model for STEM universities, to be fueled later by shared good practices among countries. The eight proposed University-Industry themes could indicate directions of development to the CDIO framework for specific optional standard definition, at a relatively high level. This paper may also contribute to advancing 4.0 STEM-educational frameworks for curriculum guidelines aligned with skills for industry.

Authors (New): 
Siegfried Rouvrais
Gilles Jacovetti
Panuwan Chantawannakul
Nuttee Suree
Sirilak Bangchokdee
Pages: 
Volume 1, pp.91-102
Affiliations: 
IMT Atlantique, France
Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Prince of Songkla University, Thailand
Keywords: 
Relationship between Academia and Industry
work integrated learning
Continuous Improvement of Education
STEM
CDIO optional standards
CDIO Standard 1
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Bennedsen, J., Rouvrais, S., Roslof, J., Kontio, J., and McCartan, C.D. (2018). Collaborative Quality Enhancement in Engineering Education: an Overview of Operational Models at a Programme Level. European Journal of Engineering Education, Pages 73–88, February.: 
Cheah, S-M, and Leong, H. (2018). Relevance of CDIO Industry 4.0 – Proposal for 2 new standards. In Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan, June 28 – July 2.: 
CTI (2017). Accreditation Criteria, Guidelines and Procedure. Commission des Titres d’Ingénieur. Retrieved from https://www.cti-commission.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/cti-references-guidelines-2018_web_201712.pdf : 
ENAEE (2015). The EUR-ACE Framework Standards and Guidelines (EAFSG). The European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://www.enaee.eu/wp- : 
European Commission (2016). 20 guiding principles for high performance apprenticeships and work-based learning. June. Retrieved from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/hr/toolkits/vet-toolkit-tackling-early-leaving/resources/high-performance-apprenticeships-work-based : 
Fernandes, N. (2020). “Economic Effects of Coronavirus Outbreak (COVID-19) on the World Economy”. March 22, revised 13th April 2020. 33 pages. : 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557504
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Campbell, D., and Hugo, R. (2020). A First Set of Adopted Optional CDIO Standards. In Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 9–11 June.: 
Morell, L. (2014). Scaffold to Build and Sustain Industry-University Partnerships. Journal of Engineering Education and Technology, India.: 
OHEC (2014) Manual for the Internal Quality Assurance for Higher Education Institutions: Office of the Higher Education Commission (OHEC), Thailand, January. Retrieved from http://www.mua.go.th/users/bhes/bhes2/56-12-27%20Manual%20for%20the%20Internal%20Final.pdf : 
ONESQA (2018) Manual for basic educational institutions, the fourth-round of external quality assessment (2016–2020) revised version (Thai version), May, Printed in Thailand. Retrieved from https://www.western.ac.th/media/attachments/2018/08/21/edit_06-08-2018.pdf : 
Pham, T. V., Nguyen, A. T., and Nguyen, H. H. (2020). Constructive alignment between CDIO standards and AUN-QA criteria. In Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 9–11 June. : 
PwC (2020). Skills for Industry Curriculum Guidelines 4.0: Future-proof education and training for manufacturing in Europe. EASME Dpt. A – COSME, H2020 SME and EMF. Final Report, 214 pages, January.: 
Rampersad G. C. (2015). Developing university-business cooperation through work-integrated learning. International Journal of Technology Management. Special Issue on University-Business Cooperation – Individuals and Organisations at the Interface. Vol.68 (3/4), pp. 203–227. : 
Rouvrais, S., B. Remaud, and M. Saveuze (2017). Work-based Learning Models in French Engineering Curricula: Insight from the French experience. In Proceedings of the 13th CDIO Intl. Conference, University of Calgary, pp. 766–781. Canada, June 18–22. Revised for European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 45(1), March 2018, pp. 89–102.: 
Skills Development Scotland & Centre for Work-based Learning (2018). Skills 4.0: A skill model to drive Scotland’s future. February. : 
UKÄ (2020). UKÄ 2020: Guidelines for reviewing the HEIs’ quality assurance processes. Published by the Swedish Higher Education Authority 2016, revised 2020, Tronarp A. (Project Manager), 33 pages. Retrieved from https://english.uka.se/ : 
WEF (2017). ASEAN 4.0: what does the Fourth Industrial Revolution mean for regional economic integration? White paper by the World Economic Forum and Asian Development Bank. Geneva, Switzerland.: 
Go to top
randomness