The evolution of team dynamics activities in Mechanical Engineering at the University of British Columbia (UBC) is presented with student feedback and key lessons learned. Rather than leave it to students to learn team skills on their own, formal teaching of team dynamics has been part of the second-year Mechanical Engineering curriculum at UBC for approximately the past ten years.
In early attempts, students displayed widespread disinterest and resistance towards learning team dynamics. The content and delivery of team dynamics material has evolved to the point where, now, almost 85% of students cite this material as being valuable and helpful. The key elements that appear to have made the new approach successful include presenting the material in a manner that is directly and immediately relevant to individual students and project teams, as well as having the material permeate throughout all elements of the course.
Pages:
10
Affiliations:
University of British Columbia, Canada
Keywords:
Team Dynamics
engineering teams
Engineering education
Year:
2010
Reference:
Camara, J.E., Carr, B.N., and Grotannn, B.L., “One Approach to Formulating and Evaluating Student Work Groups in Legal Environment of Business Courses”, Journal of Legal Studies Education, 24 (1), 1997, pp. 1–18. :
Chen, Y. and Lou, H., “Students' Perceptions of Peer Evaluation: An Expectancy Perspective”, Journal of Education for Business, 79 (5), 2004, pp. 275-282. :
Washington Accord, “Rules and Procedures”, http://www.washingtonaccord.org [accessed 10 January 2010] :
Lovgren, R.H. and M.J. Racer, “Group Dynamics in Projects: Don’t Forget the Social Aspects”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, October 2000, pp. 156-65. :
Bergman, D., Savage, C., Wahstrom, R., and Sandahl, C., “Teaching group dynamics – do we know what we are doing? An approach to evaluation”, Medical Teacher, 30, 2008, pp. 55-61.:
Crow, M. and Hill, C., “Setting the Stage for Good Group Dynamics in Semester Long Projects in the Sciences”, Journal of College Science Teaching, Jan-Feb 2006, pp. 32-5. :
Lester, E., Schofield, D., and Chapman, P., “The interaction of engineering ‘types’: A study of group dynamics and its relationship to self and peer assessment during computer-based exercises”, Engineering Education, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2006. :
Fairfield, K.D. and London, M.B., “Tuning into the Music of Groups: A Metaphor for Team-Based Learning in Management Education”, Journal of Management Education, Vol. 27, No. 6, December 2003, 654-72. :
Babad, E.Y. and Oppenheimer, B.T., “Teaching Group Dynamics in Academic Settings: Basic Dilemmas and Some Tentative Solutions”, Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 3, Oct 1978, pp. 122-6. :
Ostafichuk, P.M., Croft, E.A., Green, S.I., Schajer, G.S., Rogak, S.N., and Hodgson, A.J., “Mech 2: a fully-integrated second-year mechanical engineering curriculum”, Proceedings of the 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Education Conference, Beijing, 2006. :
Ostafichuk, P.M., Croft, E.A., Green, S.I., Schajer, G.S., and Rogak, S.N. “Analysis of Mech 2: An Award-Winning Second-Year Mechanical Engineering Curriculum”, Proceedings of Engineering Education 2008, Loughborough, UK, 2008, pp. 1-12. :
Brickell, J.L., Porter, D.B., Reynolds, M.F., and Cosgrove, R.D., “Assigning Students to Groups for Engineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods”, Journal of Engineering Education, July 1994, pp. 259-62. :
Wright, D., “Using learning groups in your classroom: a few how–to’s”, Teaching at UNL (University of Nebraska–Lincoln), 15 (4), 1994. :
Feichtner, S. & Davis, E., “Why some groups fail: a survey of students’ experiences with learning groups”. The Organizational Behaviour Teaching Review, 9 (4), 1991. :
Michaelsen, L.K., Bauman-Knight, A., and Fink, L.D., Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Stylus, Sterling, VA., 2004. :
TypeFocus, http://www.typefocus.com [accessed 10 January 2010] :
Fink, D., Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses, Josey Bass, 2003.:
iPeer, v. 2.0, http://ipeer.apsc.ubc.ca/ipeer_site/ [accessed 10 January 2010] :
Ostafichuk, P.M., and Jones, C.F., “Assessing Peer Evaluation: A Comparative Study of Two Peer Evaluation Methods Used in an Engineering Design Course”, Proceedings of CDEN 2009, Hamilton, pp. 276-281. :
Otto, K. and Wood, K., Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, 2000. :
Van de Vliert, E., and Kabanoff, B., “Towards Theory Based Measures of Conflict Management”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1990, pp. 199-209. :
on June 18, 2010 - 14:29 brucem
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
