SYSTEMS-APPROACH DESIGN OF AN UNDERGRADUATE STEM PROGRAMS ACADEMIC METHODOLOGY

SYSTEMS-APPROACH DESIGN OF AN UNDERGRADUATE STEM PROGRAMS ACADEMIC METHODOLOGY

A. Sols, P. Velasco (2019).  SYSTEMS-APPROACH DESIGN OF AN UNDERGRADUATE STEM PROGRAMS ACADEMIC METHODOLOGY. 10.

The goal of education is to empower students with knowledge and skills required to enter their professional lives and bring added value to society, through successfully tackling complex socio-technical problems. Yet, many programs have been designed without duly considering how that end goal is to be achieved. In addition to the students, other stakeholders need to be factored in. This paper describes how effective undergraduate programs in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics domains were designed following the systems approach. The identification of the learning objectives led, through consideration of all stakeholders and their requirements, to the identification and evaluation of alternative academic methodologies. The selected one was project-based-learning coupled with continuous assessment. Although project-based learning is well known, alone it does not render the required results. Feedback is a pivotal element in any educational process and continuous assessment proved to be the true learning enabler when applied in project-based learning environments. Projects are executed in an incremental manner, going from course-specific projects, through transdisciplinary projects that span across several courses, to the final capstone or graduation project. Connection with industry is always close and is articulated in multiple cooperation strategies; the main ones and the lessons learned are summarized. Being validation essential in the systems approach, this paper shows how validation was recurrently performed and how the collected feedback was used to fine-tune and improve the methodology. The main results achieved in over six years are presented. Moreover, the road ahead is presented with the sketch of a third element that will further reinforce the effectiveness of the methodology. Students’ self-assessments bring gradually implemented, to complement the methodology. It helps students develop the maturity required to have proper awareness of the quality of the work they perform, so as not to have to rely entirely on external evaluations. 

Authors (New): 
Alberto Sols
Paloma Velasco
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Universidad Europea de Madrid, Spain
Keywords: 
Systems
approach
academic
methodology
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2019
Reference: 
Alan Leshner and Layne Scherer (Editors). (2018). Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century, The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25038/graduate-stem education-for-the-21st-century: 
Bankel, J., Berggren, K. F., Engstrom, M., Wiklund, I., Crawley, E. F., Soderholm, D., . . . Ostlund, S. (2005). Benchmarking Engineering Curricula with the CDIO Syllabus. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 21(1), 121-133. : 
Berggren, K. F., Brodeur, D., Crawley, E. F., Ingemarsson, I., Litant, W. T. G., Malmqvist, J., & Östlund, S. (2003). CDIO: An international initiative for reforming engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 2(1), 49-52. : 
Blanchard, B. S., & Blyler, J. E. (2016). System engineering management (Fifth edition ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.: 
Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (1981). Systems engineering and analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. :: Prentice-Hall.: 
Boss, S. (2015). Implementing Project-Based Learning. Bloomington (IN): Solutions Tree Press. Ceawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W., & Brodeur, D. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2.0 - An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20 – 23. : 
Davis, N. T., & Aydeniz, M. (2007). Fostering Continuous Improvement and Learning Through Peer Assessment: Part of an Integral Model of Assessment. Educational Assessment, 12(2), 113. : 
Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming how organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA :: Jossey-Bass.: 
Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 78. : 
Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is Yours a Learning Organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109-116. : 
Graham, R. (2018). The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge (MA). Retrieved from http://neet.mit.edu/wpcontent/uploads/ 2018/03/MIT_NEET_GlobalStateEngineeringEducation2018.pdf: 
Ho, M. W., & Brooke, M. (2017). Practical Guide to Project-Based Learning. Singapore: WS Education.: 
INCOSE, & SERC. (2017). Worldwide Directory of Systems Engineering & Industrial Engineering Academic Programs - 2017 Edition. Retrieved from http://www.sercuarc.org/2017-edition-of theworldwide-directory-of-systems-engineering-and-industrial-engineering-programs-released/: : 
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the Standard for Project-Based Learning. Alexandria (VA): ASCD.: 
Quintás-Alonso, G. (1999). El discurso del método de Descartes. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.: 
Sage, A. P. (1992). Systems engineering. New York :: Wiley.: 
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization (1st ed. ed.). New York :: Doubleday/Currency.: 
Sols, A. (2014). Systems engineering : theory and practice. Madrid :: Universidad Pontificia Comillas. Terrón López, M. J., García García, M. J., Velasco Quintana, P. J., Gaya López, M. C., & Escribano: 
Otero, J. J. (2015). Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Educational Model: Project Based Engineering School (PBES). International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(3), : 
10.3991/ijep.v5i3.4673
Terron-Lopez, M. J., Archilla, Y. B., & Velasco-Quintana, P. J. (2017). A project based learning experience using ngo projects and a volunteer program abroad. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 33(2 Part A), 610-621. : 
Terrón-López, M. J., García-García, M. J., Velasco-Quintana, P. J., Ocampo, J., Vigil-Montaño, M. R., & Gaya-López, M. C. (2016). Implementation of a project-based engineering school: increasing student motivation and relevant learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 618-631.: 
10.1080/03043797.2016.1209462
Terrón-López, M. J., Velasco-Quintana, P. J., García-García, M. J., & Ocampo, J. R. (2017). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions: initial achievements of a Project-Based Engineering School. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1113-1127.: 
10.1080/03043797.2016.1267715
Wurdinger, S. D. (2016). The Power of Project-Based Learning. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield.: 
Go to top