Resistance To Change In Institutionalizing The CDIO Standards: From A Cascade To An Agile Improvement Model

Home » Resistance To Change I ...

Resistance To Change In Institutionalizing The CDIO Standards: From A Cascade To An Agile Improvement Model

S. Rouvrais, G. Landrac (2012).  Resistance To Change In Institutionalizing The CDIO Standards: From A Cascade To An Agile Improvement Model. 13.
2012 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland UT, Australia
PDF icon resistance_to_change_in_institutionalizing_the_cdio_standards_from_a_cascade_to_an_agile_improvement_model_.pdf

Educational program transformation plays a recurrent and key role in the future of an institution. An educational reform is a tricky strategic and engineering issue. It is also a complex management challenge which has to overcome possible conflicting and restraining forces. In order to be continuously prepared for national or international formal accreditations, and more easily face resistance to the changes induced by educational reforms, Telecom Bretagne, a French graduate engineering school, has deliberatively chosen to use the CDIO standards as a dynamic tool first under a cascade incremental cycle.

Since 2008, our policy of taking standards one step at a time, based on a process model at a slow pace, allows to support peace among educational managers, program developers and teaching staff, so that our approach results in an effective adoption of the CDIO principles. We are now able to share our experience of using some of the CDIO standards to improve program quality and meet accreditation expectations, where industrial partners and students are strong change agents.

Our approach instanced in two different programs at Master levels, a medium size full-time generalist program (650 students) and a small size specialized apprenticeship program (120 students), is described and analyzed in this paper. For institutions expecting or encountering some difficulties with staff resistance to changes, our results and the lessons learned will give advice to foster durably the adoption of the CDIO standards and to be prepared for a deeper continuous improvement based on a more agile iterative cycle in order to align more regularly with accreditation requirements.

 

Authors (New): 
Siegfried Rouvrais
Gabrielle Landrac
Pages: 
13
Affiliations: 
Institut Mines Télécom, France
Keywords: 
Implementation of the CDIO approach
Program evaluation
accreditation
educational change
sustaining curriculum reform
industry and student involvement in the development of engineering education
Year: 
2012
Reference: 
A.S. Patil, P.J. Gray (Editors). “Engineering Education Quality Assurance: A Global Perspective”. Springer 2009. 316 pages.: 
Gruba, P., Moffat, A., Sondergaard, H., and Zobel, J. “What Drives Curriculum Change?”. In ACE'04: Proceedings of the sixth conference on Australasian computing education – Vol. 30 Australian Computer Society. 2004. : 
Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Ostlund S., and Brodeur D.R., “Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach”. Springer Verlag, 286 pages, 2007. : 
J. Biggs, “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment”, Higher Education, 32, 1996, 347- 363. : 
D. Boud and al., “Assessment 2020: Seven Propositions for Assessment Reform in Higher Education,” Australian Learning and Teaching Council. 2010. : 
Wikipedia. “Grandes écoles”. http://en.wikipedia.org/ Accessed: 5 April 2011.: 
Power, A. “France’s Educational Elite”. The Telegraph. 17 November 2003. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/4190728/Frances-educational-elite.html Accessed: 5 April 2011.: 
ENAEE (European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education), “EUR-ACE Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes”, 2008. http://www.enaee.eu/pdf/EUR-ACE_Framework_Standards_20110209.pdf Accessed: March 2010. : 
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. “2011-2012 Education Criteria for Performance Excellence”. 88 pages. http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/education_criteria.cfm Accessed: April 2011 : 
C. Steed, D. Maslow, and A. Mazaletskaya. “The EFQM Excellence Model for Deploying Quality Management: a British-Russian journey”. Higher education in Europe. pp. 307-319. 2005. : 
Rouvrais S., Ormrod J., Landrac G., Mallet J., Gilliot J-M., Thepaut A., and Tremenbert P. A Mixed Project-based Learning Framework: Preparing and Developing Student Competencies in a French Grande Ecole. SEFI-EJEE European Journal of Engineering Education, "Engineering Competencies". Vol. 31(1). Pages 83--93. March 2006. : 
Gilliot J.M and Landrac G. “Project-based Learning Framework and Engineering Competencies in a French Grande Ecole”. In Proceedings of the 4th Intl. CDIO Conference, Ghent, 2008. : 
Hussey T. and Smith P., “The Uses of Learning Outcomes”. Teaching in Higher Educations Journal. Vol. 8 (3), 2003, pp. 357-368. : 
E.F. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, W.A. Lucas, and D.R. Brodeur. “Modification in the CDIO Syllabus: Updates and Expansions to Include Leadership and Entrepreneurship”. In Proceedings of the 5th Intl. CDIO Conference, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore, June 7-10, 2009: 
Rouvrais, S. and Chiprianov, V. “Architecting the CDIO Educational Framework Pursuant to Constructive Alignment Principles”. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education,Vol.2(2), IGI Global (USA), pp. 80-92, April-June 2012: 
Rouvrais S. and Kanellos, I. “Facing Computer Science Misconceptions: An Introductory Course Based on Historical Strands and Career Paths at a Glance”. In Electronic Proceedings of the 41th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, South Dakota, October 12-15, 2011. : 
on February 7, 2013 - 12:51   jenroy
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top