DISTINCTLY HUMAN - STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF TRANSVERSAL SKILLS IN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM

DISTINCTLY HUMAN - STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF TRANSVERSAL SKILLS IN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM

J. de Lima, S. Isaac, J. Zufferey (2024).  DISTINCTLY HUMAN - STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF TRANSVERSAL SKILLS IN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM .

Through their participation in accreditation procedures, engineering educators are well versed in documenting transversal skills addressed by individual courses and across programs. But to what extent do students perceive support for the transversal skills that interest them? The student perspective is important to assess the curriculum as experienced by students but also because students’ perception of what is taught is related to what they actually learn. Recent reports from our institution found that course documents fell short of institutional goals for transversal skill development and what graduates wanted skill development. While changes are still being implemented, this survey investigates students’ current experiences. We asked 244 Bachelor and Masters engineering students about the transversal skills they encountered in the fall 2023 semester. Guided by the CDIO syllabus, we coded students' open-ended responses about the transversal skills they were most interested in developing and those for which they received the least support to develop. All three categories of transversal skills were found in students’ responses, while disciplinary or technical skills were completely absent. This shows that transversal skills are understood by students. Skills from the category Interpersonal skills: Teamwork and Communication were cited most often both for interest (46% of responses) and for lack of support (45% of responses). The CDIO syllabus categories of Personal and professional skills and the Innovation process were also well represented. Using chi-squared tests with a resampling approach, our findings indicate that students do not perceive adequate support to develop the skills they prioritise. Our study suggests that the increased attention to developing engineering students’ transversal skills is not yet sufficient. Frameworks and resources that support teachers to incorporate skill development in their courses are an important element in ensuring students receive the explicit and scaffolded instruction they need to develop these important skills.

Authors (New): 
Joelyn de Lima
Siara Isaac
Jessica Dehler Zufferey
Keywords: 
Transversal Skills
Perceived curriculum
Engineering education
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2024
Reference: 
3T PLAY. (2024). TEACHING TRANSVERSAL SKILLS FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS - a handbook of practical activities with tangibles. EPFL.: 
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10392281
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology [ABET]. (2023). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2023 – 2024 | ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2023-2024/: 
Brunhaver, S. R., Korte, R. F., Barley, S. R., & Sheppard, S. D. (2018). Bridging the Gaps between Engineering Education and Practice. In R. B. Freeman & H. Salzman (Eds.), US Engineering in a Global Economy (pp. 129–163). University of Chicago Press. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c12687: 
Busteed, B. (2014, February 25). Higher Education’s Work Preparation Paradox. Gallup.Com. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/173249/higher-education-work-preparation-paradox.aspx: 
Commission des titres d’ingénieur [CTI]. (2023). The CTI’s Major Criteria and Procedures – CTI – Commission des Titres d’Ingénieur. https://www.cti-commission.fr/en/fonds-documentaire: 
Craps, S., Pinxten, M., Knipprath, H., & Langie, G. (2022). Different roles, different demands. A competency-based professional roles model for early career engineers, validated in industry and higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(1), 144–163. : 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1889468
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W. A., & Brodeur, D. R. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2.0. An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education (M. Vigild, Ed.). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:110610803: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education The CDIO Approach. Springer US. : 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38290-6_3
Direito, I., Pereira, A., & De Oliveira Duarte, A. M. (2014). The Development of Skills in the ICT Sector: Analysis of Engineering Students’ Perceptions about Transversal Skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30, 1556–1561.: 
Direito, I., Pereira, A., & Duarte, A. M. de O. (2012). Engineering Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Soft Skills: Relations with Self-Efficacy and Learning Styles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 843–851.: 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.571
Donald, W. E., Baruch, Y., & Ashleigh, M. (2019). The undergraduate self-perception of employability: Human capital, careers advice, and career ownership. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 599–614.: 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1387107
European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education [ENAEE]. (2023). EUR-ACE® Framework Standards and Guidelines. ENAEE. https://www.enaee.eu/eur-ace-system/standards-and-guidelines/: 
Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464.: 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014
Hirudayaraj, M., Baker, R., Baker, F., & Eastman, M. (2021). Soft Skills for Entry-Level Engineers: What Employers Want. Education Sciences, 11(10), Article 10. : 
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100641
Isaac, S., & de Lima, J. (2024a). How to support students giving each other constructive feedback, especially when it is difficult to hear. In Teaching Transversal Skills for Engineering Students—A Handbook of Practical Activities with Tangibles. EPFL. : 
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10392344
Isaac, S., & de Lima, J. (2024b). How to support students to develop skills that promote sustainability. In Teaching Transversal Skills for Engineering Students—A Handbook of Practical Activities with Tangibles. EPFL. : 
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10731771
Isaac, S., Petringa, N., Jalali, Y., Tormey, R., & Dehler Zufferey, J. (2023). Are Engineering Teachers Ready to Leverage the Power of Play to Teach Transversal Skills? Proceedings of the SEFI 2023 Conference. SEFI 2023. : 
https://doi.org/10.21427/QP3D-B914
Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2019). Employability in Engineering Education: Are Engineering Students Ready for Work? In S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, C. Didier, M. Meganck, & M. Murphy (Eds.), The Engineering-Business Nexus: Symbiosis, Tension and Co-Evolution (pp. 499–520). Springer International Publishing. : 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_22
Kovacs, H., Capdevila, I., Lermigeaux-Sarrade, I. J. L., & Jermann, P. (2023). From University to Work: Alumni Viewpoints. Proceedings of the CDIO 2023 Conference. CDIO 2023.: 
Kovacs, H., Delisle, J., Mekhaiel, M., Dehler Zufferey, J., Tormey, R., & Vuilliomenet, P. (2020). Teaching Transversal Skills in the Engineering Curriculum: The Need to Raise the Temperature. SEFI 48th Annual Conference: Engaging Engineering Education. Proceedings. SEFI 48th Annual Conference: Engaging Engineering Education.: 
Kovacs, H., Milosevic, T., & Niculescu, A. (2023). Planned, Taught, Learnt: Analysis of Transversal Skills Through Curriculum Using Portfolio. SEFI 2023 Proceedings. SEFI 2023. : 
https://doi.org/10.21427/R0JP-8277
Lermigeaux-Sarrade, I., Kovacs, H., & Capdevila, I. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of Master Programmes: Ready for Work in 2021? Proceedings of the 49th Annual Conference (SEFI 2021). 49th Annual Conference (SEFI 2021). https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/290641?ln=en: 
National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2017). Grand Challenges for Engineering. https://nae.edu/187212/NAE-Grand-Challenges-for-Engineering: 
Passow, H. J., & Passow, C. H. (2017). What Competencies Should Undergraduate Engineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 475–526. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20171
Patacsil, F., & Tablatin, C. L. S. (2017). Exploring the importance of soft and hard skills as perceived by IT internship students and industry: A gap analysis. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(3), Article 3. : 
https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.271
Picard, C., Hardebolle, C., Tormey, R., & Schiffmann, J. (2022). Which professional skills do students learn in engineering team-based projects? European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(2), 314–332.: 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1920890
Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 453–465. : 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912460400
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 170–183). SAGE Publications, Inc.: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n12
Succi, C., & Canovi, M. (2020). Soft skills to enhance graduate employability: Comparing students and employers’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1834–1847. : 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1585420
United Nations [UN]. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda: 
Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A Model of Empathy in Engineering as a Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123–148. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20159
Winberg, C., Bramhall, M., Greenfield, D., Johnson, P., Rowlett, P., Lewis, O., Waldock, J., & Wolff, K. (2020). Developing employability in engineering education: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(2), 165–180. : 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1534086
Go to top
randomness