DEVELOPING A DIDACTIC FOUNDATION FOR THE TECH FACULTY AT AARHUS UNIVERSITY

DEVELOPING A DIDACTIC FOUNDATION FOR THE TECH FACULTY AT AARHUS UNIVERSITY

G. ien, J. Bennedsen (2023).  DEVELOPING A DIDACTIC FOUNDATION FOR THE TECH FACULTY AT AARHUS UNIVERSITY. 45-55.

In January 2022 the Faculty of Technical Sciences (TECH) at Aarhus University (AU) appointed a working group to develop a didactic foundation for teaching at TECH. The background was a need to develop a joint platform for teaching, pedagogical competence development, and other educational activities at the faculty, after a recent history of organizational mergers and changes, and subsequent development of a new joint strategy. The working group was to identify important factors that should characterize future teaching at TECH and propose a commonly recommended foundation upon which TECH teachers can collectively build, reflect, and improve their teaching. This paper will justify and describe the work process, present and reflect upon the outcome, relate the outcome to the CDIO Standards and Syllabus, discuss lessons learnt, and provide advice for others engaging in similar work.

Authors (New): 
Geir Egil Dahle Øien
Jens Bennedsen
Pages: 
45-55
Affiliations: 
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Aarhus University, Denmark
Keywords: 
Didactics
pedagogy
Change Management
Teaching Practice
faculty competence
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO standard 4
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
CDIO. (2023). Worldwide CDIO Initiative. Retrieved January 30 from http://cdio.org/: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education : The CDIO Approach (2. 2014 ed.). Springer International Publishing. : 
D'Andrea, V.-M., & Gosling, D. (2005). Improving teaching and learning [in higher education] : a whole institution approach. Open University Press. : 
DTU. (2023). DTU's Policies. Retrieved January 31 from https://issuu.com/dtudk/docs/dtu_s_policies?fr=sYWU0ODQ4NjgwMg: 
Gedda, O., Wikberg-Nilsson, Å., Garvare, R., & Edström, K. (2016, June 12-16). Waves of reform: analysing a history of educational development concepts. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland.: 
Insights. (2023). Insights Discovery. Retrieved January 30 from https://www.insights.com/us/products/insights-discovery/: 
KTH. (2012). Vizion27. Retrieved January 31 from https://www.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.1031988.1606467509!/v2027en%20slutversion-accessible.pdf: 
Luleå University of Technology. (2023). LTU's Pedagogical Principles. Retrieved January 31 from https://www.ltu.se/org/hpc/LTU-s-Pedagogiska-Principer?l=en: 
NTNU. (2018). Strategy 2018-2025. Retrieved January 31 from https://www.ntnu.edu/core-tasks#education: 
The TECH Faculty. (2022). Strategy 2025 - Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University. https://tech.medarbejdere.au.dk/fileadmin/ingen_mappe_valgt/Tech_medarbejdere/Ledelse_og_strategi/TECH_STRAT2025_UK_FINAL_240122.pdf: 
Øien, G. E. D., & Bodsberg, N. R. (2022). A Roadmap for Engineering and Technology Education Reform at The Norwegian University of Technology (NTNU) Prodeedings for 50th Annual Conference ofThe European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI 2022), Barcelona, Spain. : 
Øien, G. E. D., Bodsberg, N. R., & Lyng, R. (2022). Redesigning Norwegian Engineering Education Pt. 1: Benchmarking and Principles for Development [CDIO Projects in Project Paper presented at The 18th International CDIO Conference]. Reykjavik University. https://www.ntnu.edu/documents/1310786022/1312527736/CDIO2022-Submission112-ConceptPaper-OienBodsbergLyng-FTS-Pt1.pdf/ba2dace2-c9a7-85b2-e63e-c57a524838a2?t=1649325535832 : 
Aarhus University. (2004). Godkendelse af civilingeniøruddannelser (in Danish). Aarhus Universitet. https://www.au.dk/fileadmin/www.au.dk/om_au/organisation_og_ledelse/bestyrelse/5-2004/20040831p7/20040831p71a.pdf: 
Go to top