COVID-19 FORCED REMOTE TEACHING AND UNIVERSITY EDUCATION AFTER IT

COVID-19 FORCED REMOTE TEACHING AND UNIVERSITY EDUCATION AFTER IT

E. van Puffelen, T. Stevens, S. Banihashem, H. Biemans, O. Noroozi, N. Raeven, et al (2022).  COVID-19 FORCED REMOTE TEACHING AND UNIVERSITY EDUCATION AFTER IT. 739-750.

The COVID-19 outbreak at the beginning of 2020 disrupted students' and teachers' learning and teaching activities worldwide as it led to a quick transition from education, including face-to-face interaction to emergency remote teaching (ERT). During this ERT period monitoring research on the experiences and innovation needs was done at Wageningen University & Research. This was supplemented with small teacher and student group consultations. The results show that a focus on student well-being is needed in the years ahead. The ERT was appreciated as it kept education going on. Still, students indicated lack of sense of connectedness and a strong desire to have face-to-face education as part of the Teaching and Learning Activities (TLA). For the following years, online versions of most courses should be available to stay prepared for online education when needed. That includes online alternatives for vulnerable TLA's like labs and excursions. The ERT courses hastily developed in 2020 can be redesigned in combination with a blended learning curriculum for less restricted times. This requires a well-designed mix of TLA's to activate students, rather than simply flipping one kind of TLA for another. In combination with the (re)design of courses geared to sense of connectedness, this might add up to the resilient curricula we need for the following years.

Authors (New): 
Emiel van Puffelen
Tim Stevens
Seyyed Kazem Banihashem
Harm Biemans
Omid Noroozi
Nienke Raeven
Perry den Brok
Pages: 
739-750
Affiliations: 
Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands
Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Keywords: 
emergency remote teaching
Well-being
online & face-to-face learning
education design
resilient curricula
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2022
Reference: 
4TU.CEE. (2022). Innovation map of the 4TU Centre for Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://www.4tu.nl/cee/en/innovation/: 
Crawford, J., et al. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3, (1), 1-20.: 
Dopmeijer, J., Nuijen, J., Busch, M., & Tak, N. (2021). Mental health of students in higher education. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10029/625362: 
Gaebel, M., Zhang, T., Stoeber, H., & Morrisroe, A. (2021). Digitally enhanced learning and teaching in european higher education institutions. Retrieved from https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/digihe% 20survey%20report.pdf: 
Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research. Pages 258-268.: Sage.: 
Hodges, C.B., et al. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause review, March 27, 2020.: 
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., & Rosén, A. (2020). CDIO Standards 3.0–Updates to the Core CDIO Standards. Paper presented at the 16th International CDIO Conference.: 
Mostafavi, E., et al. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: A next phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and a call to arms for system sciences and precision medicine. MedComm, 3, (1), e119.: 
https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.119
Researchgate. (2022). Education design for new educational challenges of universities. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/project/Education-design-for-new-educational-challenges-of-universities: 
Rumbley, L.E. (2020). Coping with COVID-19: International higher education in Europe. European Association for International Education., 29, 2020.: 
Stevens, T., den Brok, P., Biemans, H., & Noroozi, O. (2020a). The Transition to Online Education, a case study of Wageningen University & Research. Retrieved from www.4tu.nl/cee/innovation/project/13042/the-transition-to-online-education-during-the-corona-crisissituation: 
Stevens, T., den Brok, P., Biemans, H., & Noroozi, O. (2020b). The Transition to Online Education, a case study of Wageningen University & Research, Report 2: period 6. Retrieved from www.4tu.nl/cee/innovation/project/13042/the-transition-to-online-education-during-the-corona-crisissituation: 
van Puffelen, E.A.M. (2017). Designing blended engineering courses. Proceedings of the 45th SEFI Annual Conference 2017, Angra do Heroísmo - Terceira, Azores, Portugal. 1308-1312. http://edepot.wur.nl/424719: 
van Puffelen, E.A.M., & Tauecchio, N. (2021). Future education Innovation at WUR. Requested topics for future education innovation at Wageningen University & Research. Retrieved from Wageningen: https://edepot.wur.nl/541565: 
van Puffelen, E.A.M., van Berkum, M., & Diederen, J. (2018). Balancing online and face-to-face teaching and learning activities. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa, Japan. 339- 348. http://edepot.wur.nl/458051: 
van Puffelen, E.A.M., & Vonk, C. (2020). Learning from education innovation using the 4TU.CEE innovation map. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, Hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 8-10 June 2020. 264-272. https://edepot.wur.nl/532014: 
Wageningen University. (2017). Vision for Education. Retrieved from Wageningen: https://www.wur.nl/en/show/Wageningen-University-Vision-for-Education.htm: 
Go to top