CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT IN CDIO: ENHANCING FACULTY COMPETENCY IN REFLECTIVE PRACTICE

CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT IN CDIO: ENHANCING FACULTY COMPETENCY IN REFLECTIVE PRACTICE

S. CHEAH (2022).  CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT IN CDIO: ENHANCING FACULTY COMPETENCY IN REFLECTIVE PRACTICE. 3-17.

An increasingly popular tool used by teachers to continually update and expand their professional knowledge base and to improve their teaching practices so as to address the learning needs of students is reflective practice; which requires teachers to look at what they do in the classroom and think about why they do it, if it works and why it works; and vice versa. This paper advocated for the specific elaboration on the use of reflective practice in the CDIO Framework. It consists of 2 main parts. The first part questions of the meaning of reflective practice in the “traditional” sense as currently used in the literature. The second part proposes an “extended” use to drive continual improvement at the program level. For the first part, the paper first presents a quick literature review of reflective practice and other similar sounding words such as reflection, reflexivity, etc and strives to clarify the subtle differences among them. The paper then argues that the word ‘reflection’ as used in CDIO Standards 9 and 12 also needs further elaboration as they appeared to address 2 different target groups, namely students and lecturers respectively. The paper argued that clarity is necessary as witnessed by the increasing number of papers presented at International CDIO Conferences had used the terms interchangeably and can cause confusion among the CDIO community; as evidenced by the “quick-and-dirty” review on past papers retrieved from the CDIO Knowledge Library. The first part concludes with sharing of an evidence-based reflective practice toolkit from Singapore Polytechnic which had made reflective practice mandatory for all teaching staff. The second part of the paper argues for the use of reflective practice beyond individual lecturers, and advocated for use in continual improvement alongside the self-evaluation process based on the 12 Core CDIO Standards. This part briefly discusses papers from the earlier “quick-and-dirty” study to look for those with focus on program evaluation. The paper then shares the author’s own approach which is derived from the metaphor of Mirror, Microscope and Binoculars widely used in service learning projects. More specifically, the paper demonstrates how the same metaphor can be used to guide the self-evaluation by mapping each item to the 12 CDIO Core Standards. Lastly, this paper concludes by proposing performance indicators that can be used to assist lecturers in assessing the effectiveness of his/her reflective practice process which is applicable to both teaching and learning setting as well as program evaluation.

Authors (New): 
Sin-Moh CHEAH
Pages: 
3-17
Affiliations: 
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
reflection
Reflective Practice
continual improvement
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2022
Reference: 
Alexander, P.A. (2017). Reflection and Reflexivity in Practice versus in Theory: Challenges of Conceptualization, Complexity, and Competence, Educational Psychologist, 52:4, pp.307-314: 
Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting Reflection in Learning: A Model, in Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (eds), London: Kogan Page: 
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 
Brookfield, S. (1990). Using Critical Incidents to Explore Learners’ Assumptions, in Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning, J. Mezirow & Associates (eds),.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.177-193: 
Clark, R. & Andrews, J. (2011). Reflection and Reflexivity in Reviewing and Evaluating CDIO: An Empirical Approach to Evaluation, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, June 20-23; Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark: 
Chabon, S. & Lee-Wilkerson, D. (2006). Use of Journal Writing in the Assessment of CSD Students’ Learning about Diversity: A Method Worthy of Reflection, Communication Disorders Quarterly, Vol.27, No.3, pp.146-158: 
Cheah, S.M. & Sale, D. (2019). Enhancing Student Engagement in Flipped Classroom using Autonomy- Supportive Teaching, Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, June 25-27; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark: 
Cheah, S.M., Wong, Y.Y. & Yang, K. (2019). A Model to Explicitly Teach Self-Directed Learning to Chemical Engineering Students, Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, June 25-27; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark: 
Cheah, S.M. & Yang, K. (2018). CDIO Framework and SkillsFuture: Redesign of Chemical Engineering Curriculum after 10 Years of Implementing CDIO, Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, June 28 – July 2; Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan: 
Clark, R. & Andrews, J. (2011). Reflection and Reflexivity in Reviewing and Evaluating CDIO: An Empirical Approach to Evaluation, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, June 20-23; Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark: 
Cooper, M. (1997). The Big Dummy’s Guide to Service Learning: Twenty -seven Simple Answers to Good Questions on Faculty, Programmatic, Student, Administrative, and Non-profit Issues, in Models for Reflection in CEL, Community-Engaged Learning Office, University of Victoria; available from https://www.uvic.ca/cue/assets/docs/models-for-reflection-in-cel, accessed March 5, 2021: 
Cosgrove, T. & O’Reilly J. (2019). Theory, Practice and Reflexivity: The Next Challenge for CDIO? Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, June 25-27; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark: 
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: Are Statement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process, Boston: DC Heath and Company.: 
Eby, M.A. (2000). Understanding Professional Development, in Brechin, A., Brown, H. & Eby, M.A. (Eds), Critical Practice in Health and Social Care, London: Sage: 
Edelbro, C., Eitzenberger, A., Edstrom, K. Jonsson, K. & Swedberg, K. (2017). Engaging with Industry Stakeholders to Support Program Development, Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, June 18-22; University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada: 
Ferrell, E.W. (2015). Reflection in Participatory Action Research: Mirrors, Microscopes, & Binoculars, Proceedings of the Action Research Network of the Americas Conference, May 7-10; Toronto, Canada: 
Finlay, L. (2008). Reflecting on ‘Reflective Practice’, discussion paper prepared for Practice-based Professional Learning Centre, The Open University: 
Finlay, L. & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 
Fook, J. (2015). Reflective Practice and Critical Reflection, in Lishman, J. (Ed), Handbook for Practice Learning in Social Work and Social Care, 3rd Ed; Jessica Kingsley Publishers: 
Garcia, L., González, A., Viveros, F. & Marciales, G. (2014). An Integrated Curriculum, Learning Assessment and Program Evaluation Model, Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, June 16-19; Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain: 
González, A., Marciales, G., del Mar Ruiz, M., Sanchez, J. & Viveros, F. (2013). CDIO Learning Workspaces in the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, June 9-13; Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: 
Hobbs, V. (2007). Faking It or Hating It: Can Reflective Practice be Forced? Reflective Practice, 8(3), pp.405-417: 
Jay, J.K. & Johnson, K.L. (2002). Capturing Complexity: A Typology for Reflective Practice for Teacher Education, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol.18, pp.73-85: 
Khan, P. (2006). The Role and Effectiveness of Reflective Practices in Programmes for New Academic Staff: A Grounded Practitioner Review of the Research Literature, The Higher Education Academy: 
Koole, S., Dornan, T., Aper, L., Valcke, M., Cohen-Schotanus, J. & Derese, A. (2011). Factors Confounding the Assessment of Reflection: A Critical Review, BMC Medical Education, 11:104: 
Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming Teaching Practice: Becoming the Critically Reflective Teacher, Reflective Practice, 1(3); pp.293-307: 
Loughran, J.J. (2002). Effective Reflective Practice: In Search of Meaning in Learning about Teaching, Journal of Teacher Education, 53; pp.33-43: 
Malmqvist, J., Edstrom, K. & Rosen, A. (2020). CDIO Standards 3.0 – Updates to the Core CDIO Standards, Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, June 8-11; Gothenburg, Sweden: 
Marcos, J.M.M., Miguel, E.S. & Tillema, H. (2009). Teacher Reflection on Action: What is Said (in Research) and What is Done (in Teaching), Reflective Practice, Vol.10, No.2; pp.191-204: 
McGarr, O. & O’Gallchóir, C. (2020). The Futile Quest for Honesty in Reflective Writing: Recognising Self-criticism as a Form of Self-enhancement, Teaching in Higher Education, 25:7, pp.902-908: 
McLeod, G.A., Barr, J. & Welch, A. (2015). Best Practice for Teaching and Learning Strategies to Facilitate Student Reflection in Pre-Registration Health Professional Education: An Integrative Review, Creative Education, Vol.6, pp.440-454: 
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning, San Francisco: Jossey Bass: 
McCarthy, Y. (2013). Levels of Reflection: The Mirror, The Microscope, and The Binoculars, International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, Vol.10, No.1; pp.1-22: 
Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development, Kogan Page, London: 
Moon, J. (2001). Reflection in Higher Education Learning, PDP Working Paper 4, Learning and Teaching Support Network, University of Exeter: 
Orland-Barak, L. (2005). Portfolios as Evidence of Reflective Practice: What Remains ‘Untold’, Educational Research, Vol.47, No.1, pp.25-44: 
Rogers, R.R. (2001). Reflection in Higher Education: A Concept Analysis, Innovative Higher Education, Vol.26, No.1; pp.37-57: 
Sale, D. (2015). Creative Teaching: An Evidence-based Approach, Springer, New York: 
Sale, D. (2020). Creative Teachers: Self-Directed Learners, Springer, New York: 
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Temple Smith, London: 
Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating The Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 
Seibert, K.W. & Daudelin, M.W. (1999). The Role of Reflection in Managerial Learning: Theory, Research and Practice, Praeger: 
Smyth, J. (1992). Teachers’ Work and the Politics of Reflection, American Educational Research Journal, 29, pp.267-300: 
Svedberg, G.K. (2011). Critical Self-Reflections on the Classical Teaching Culture in Engineering, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, June 20-23; Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark: 
Wald, H.S., Borkan, J.M., Scott Taylor, J., Anthony, D., & Reis, S.P. (2012). Fostering and Evaluating Reflective Capacity in Medical Education: Developing the REFLECT Rubric for Assessing Reflective Writing, Academic Medicine, 87(1), pp.41-50: 
Ward, J.R. & McCotter, S.S. (2004). Reflection as a Visible Outcome for Preservice Teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education, 20; pp.243–257: 
York-Barr, J., Sommers, W.A., Ghere, G.S. & Montie, J.K. (2005). Reflective Practice to Improve Schools, 2nd Ed., Corwin: 
Go to top
randomness