THE ASSESSMENT OF ENGINEERING REASONING RECORDED IN STUDENT ENGINEERING DESIGN JOURNALS

THE ASSESSMENT OF ENGINEERING REASONING RECORDED IN STUDENT ENGINEERING DESIGN JOURNALS

D. Spooner, G. Huet, C. Fortin, A. Vadean, R. Niewoehner (2009).  THE ASSESSMENT OF ENGINEERING REASONING RECORDED IN STUDENT ENGINEERING DESIGN JOURNALS. 9.

An engineer’s journal, also known as a logbook, is a key document where the individual contributions to a project and the evolving design rationale are made explicit. The development of project-based learning at Ecole Polytechnique Montreal is an ideal setting for students to use an individual or project journal. In the 1 st year design project, a strong emphasis is put on the information elements and structure that must be present in the student’s journal. In the 2nd and 3rd year projects the journal’s content builds on this structure. This paper focuses on methods used to assess the contents of a 4th year student’s journal. In this assessment model, the evaluator grades the journal content and provides feedback to the individual students according to three key parameters, namely: content diversity, critical thinking demonstration and project management information. The critical thinking abilities are assessed by reading through the journal content using a predefined analysis grid. This grid contains 11 “Critical Thinking intellectual standards” reformulated as questions so students and evaluators alike can get a better understanding of how the criteria applies specifically to journals. The paper discusses how the implementation and assessment of journals provides a formalized assessment structure to an empirical engineering practice. Moreover, a number of unexpected outcomes from the journal assessment process are also reported, such as: the increase of reusable information, the identification of an individual’s contributions to a project, the sparse use of sketches to solve complex spatial problems, etc. Finally, the authors conclude on new perspectives to increase the efficiency of the journal assessments along with new opportunities for collaboration and exchange of information in a project context through the use of electronic journals. 

Authors (New): 
Daniel Spooner
Greg Huet
Clément Fortin
Aurélian Vadean
Robert Niewoehner
Pages: 
9
Affiliations: 
École Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada
United States Naval Academy, USA
Keywords: 
Critical thinking
designer’s journal
Engineering reasoning
Professional skills
Year: 
2009
Reference: 
P Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Ostlund S. and Brodeur D., Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Springer, New York, 2007.: 
Fortin, C., Sanschagrin, B., Cloutier, G. and Huet, G., “Redesign of an engineering curriculum based on four integrated learning projects”, Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2007.: 
Huet G., Sanschagrin B., Gagnon M., Spooner D., Vadean A. and Camarero R., “The assessment of student teamwork to promote CDIO learning objectives”, Proceedings of the 4th International CDIO Conference, 16-19 June, 2008, Hoogeschool Gent, Gent, Belgium.: 
McAlpine H., Hicks B.J., Huet G., and Culley S.J., “An investigation into the use and content of the engineer’s logbook”, Design Studies, 27 (4), 2006, pp 481-504.: 
McAlpine H., Hicks B.J., and Culley S.J., “A review of state of the art technologies for supporting a designer’s electronic logbook”, Proceedings of the International Design Conference, 15-18 May 2006, Dubrovnik, Croatia.: 
Paul, R., Niewoehner, R. and Elder, L., Engineering Reasoning, Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2006, 56 p.: 
McAlpine H., Hicks B.J., and Culley S.J., “Investigating the Structure and Organization of the Engineering Logbooks for More Effective Re-use”, Proceedings of the International Design Conference, 19-22 May 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia.: 
Huet G., Spooner D., Vadean A., Salako F., Sanschagrin B. and Camarero R., “Knowledge Management: A New Educational Challenge for Student Design Projects”, Proceedings of the the 11th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, 10-11 September 2009, Brighton, UK.: 
Fortin C., Huet G., & Crawley E., “A description and analysis of Multimodal Learning Environments in North America for future CDIO workspaces implementation”, Proceedings of the 4th International CDIO Conference, 16-19 June, 2008, Hoogeschool Gent, Gent, Belgium.: 
Go to top
randomness